Take the Ahmadinejad Pop Quiz

Iranian President Ahmadinejad recently addressed the UN and caused a walkout. What despicable things did he say to deserve such a reaction? Can you take the Ahmadinejad Challenge? Can you answer his pop quiz without walking out of the room in disgust?
My answers in red


Who abducted forcefully tens of millions of people from their homes in Africa and other regions of the world during the dark period of slavery, making them a victim of their materialistic greed? US/Britain/Europe?

Who imposed colonialism for over four centuries upon this world? US/Britain/Europe?

Who occupied lands and massively plundered resources of other nations, destroyed talents, and alienated languages, cultures and identities of nations? US/Britain/Europe?

Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless. Who created the wars in Korean peninsula and in Vietnam?
Germany/Communists?
Who imposed, through deceits and hypocrisy, the Zionism and over sixty years of war, homelessness, terror and mass murder on the Palestinian people and on countries of the region? Israel/US?

Who imposed and supported for decades military dictatorship and totalitarian regimes on Asian, African, and Latin American nations? US?

Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals? US?

Whose economies rely on waging wars and selling arms? US?

Who provoked and encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade and impose an eight-year war on Iran, and who assisted and equipped him to deploy chemical weapons against our cities and our people? US?

Who used the mysterious September 11 incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq , killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources? US/did he really say that?? This is the one that sent the US delegates packing.

Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations? US?

Which country’s military spending exceeds annually a thousand billion dollars, more than the military budgets of all countries of the world combined? US?

Which governments are the most indebted ones in the world? US/Europe?

Who dominates the policy-making establishments of the world economy? US/Europe?

Who are responsible for the world economic recession, and are imposing the consequences on America, Europe and the world in general? The Banksters?

Which governments are always ready to drop thousands of bombs on other countries, but ponder and hesitate to provide aid to famine-stricken people in Somalia or in other places?
US?
Who are the ones dominating the Security Council which is ostensibly responsible for safeguarding the international security? US/Europe?

Here is the full video:




He continues...

The main question is the quest for the root cause of such attitudes. The prime reason should be sought in the beliefs and tendencies of the establishment. An assembly of people in contradiction with the inner human instincts and disposition who also have no faith in God and in the path of the divine prophets, replace their lust for power and materialistic ends with heavenly values.

To them, only power and wealth prevail, and every attempt must bring into focus these sinister goals.

Oppressed nations have no hope to restore or protect their legitimate rights against these powers. These powers seek their progress, prosperity and dignity through imposing poverty, humiliation and annihilation to others.

They consider themselves superior to others, enjoying special privileges and concessions. They have no respect for others and easily violate the rights of all nations and governments.

They proclaim themselves as the indisputable custodians of all governments and nations through intimidation, recourse to threat and force, and abuse the international mechanisms. They simply break all the internationally recognized regulations.

They insist on imposing their lifestyle and beliefs on others. They officially support racism. They weaken countries through military intervention, and destroy their infrastructures, in order to plunder their resources by making them all the more dependent.

They sow the seeds of hate and hostility among nations and people of different pursuits, in order to prevent them from fulfilling their goals of development and progress.
Read full transcript

This is the one that triggered the mass walkout:

If some European countries still use the Holocaust, after six decades, as the excuse to pay fine or ransom to the Zionists, should it not be an obligation upon the slave masters or colonial powers to pay reparations to the affected nations?

These were the 9/11 comments:

Last year, when the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11 incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States.
Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea.
Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?
Why should it not have been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize those who launched terrorist groups and brought wars and other miseries into the region?
Is there any classified information that must be kept secret?

Don't know about you, but I'm still in the room listening. OK, he sails pretty close to the wind with the anti-Semitic tones and Holocaust denial, but in the most part he's calling it as it is in my books. Why the walkout? I imagine the accused nations have no viable defence, so walking out allows them to label the Iranian as a conspiracy theorist nutjob and close down the debate. I would guess that those who didn't walk out were representatives from the smaller victim nations who would agree wholeheatedly with Ahmadinejad. You can see who's left...Iraq, Afghanistan, African nations, even Arabs, and they applaud warmly at the end.

Why do I suspect that Iran shall be found harboring WMD's? They are a very dangerous nation, if their President is anything to go on!

Where were the Truthers?!

The 10th anniversary of September 11th came....and went. There was a lot of ceremony, emotion and empathy...but where were the Truthers? I was expecting to see a tsunami of black & sloganed T-shirts and banners. They could have been respectful and kept silent vigil, but they weren't even there...nowhere to be seen. Have they all given up in frustration, or just become apathetic and weary? I scanned the channels and web but nothing seemed to be happening. I though at least Alex Jones would do a live radio report. What happened?

Turns out NY was in lockdown for blocks around Ground Zero. Noone could get within blocks of the site. Police were brandishing M16s and shotguns. Those wearing "Investigate 9/11" shirts were not provided access and some were even detained for their attire. One man who opened his mouth to exercise his freedom of speech was arrested.

George W said "They hate our freedoms" If this is "freedom", I would have to agree with Al Qaeda.

Here is Luke Rudkowski's report from the day's proceedings:

One thing I was surprised to see on mainstream TV was a documentary about the 9/11 firefighters that aired on SBS. They actually showed footage of Building 7 coming down but there were no remarks made about it. They certainly featured the health problems of first responders due to the toxic asbestos laden dust and Whitman's assurance that the air was safe to breathe. Guess that's something.

Comments from Richard Gage & Luke Rudkowski-where to from here?:

48% of New Yorkers Want New WTC7 Investigation

This Sunday will be the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. As I cruise the channels on free to air TV in Sydney, there are stories on 9/11 coming from all directions...what the President and the White House staff did hour by hour on that fateful day, how Sesame Street and Johnny Cash songs are used at Guantanamo Bay to torture detainees at high volume. I saw a story in the afternoon rag about the hero dogs of 9/11. They are turning up the volume. They have to. After 10 years of inadequate answers to our questions, the Truth Movement has gathered great momentum. The number of signatories to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has grown steadily to 1500. The "Building What?" TV add campaigns have aired on NY TV.

A recent poll of New Yorkers found that 48% support a new investigation into the collapse of WTC 7. Full story They polled New Yorkers, locals who were there, friends and family who lost loved ones. These people can't be dismissed as "conspiracy theorists". They deserve respect.

I suspect the main theme of the anticipated propaganda onslaught will be around reminiscing, closure and healing after 9/11....trying to put the 9/11 baby to bed. It's convenient timing that they got Bin Laden recently. We needed that for closure. You certainly won't see anything about WTC7, Bush/Bin Laden connections, thermitic materials in the dust etc. That's our job...making sure the 9/11 baby doesn't settle and keeps screaming. I suspect the 9/11 truth activists will be thick on the ground this Sunday. It will be interesting to see if they get coverage on the mainstream news. I am envious of anyone who has the oportunity to be in New York on this special day.

Just found this. Here is video of Luke Rudkowski confronting Thomas Kean, Chairman of the 9/11 Commission Report. Kean runs from the tough questions being asked by Luke on behalf of the victims's families. Guilty demeanour if ever I saw it.

Ron Paul - The Invisible Man!

The US presidential candidates are out of the starting box and racing. However, a strange thing is happening. After the first straw poll in Iowa, the official 2nd place getter is getting no media coverage. That's Ron Paul. You hear comments about Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, but Paul is being edited out. Why would that happen? It wouldn't be because he's the only candidate who has a proven record of true libertarian values, calling for restoration of the Constitution, ending the Federal Reserve bank, ending the wars & stringing up the banksters? It wouldn't be because he's "fair dinkum" as we Aussies would say?

If you take into account that Bachmann enticed 4000 people with a free country music concert in return for their vote, Paul is miles ahead in the lead.

Ron Paul is a medical doctor. He comes from a family of Lutheran pastors and he even considered the ministry himself. He's a genuine born again Christian. Not a fake faither for the bible belt vote. Here is his "faith statement":

In a summary about his faith, Ron Paul writes, "I have never been one who is comfortable talking about my faith in the political arena. In fact, the pandering that typically occurs in the election season I find to be distasteful. But for those who have asked, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, and that I seek His guidance in all that I do. I know, as you do, that our freedoms come not from man, but from God. My record of public service reflects my reverence for the Natural Rights with which we have been endowed by a loving Creator."

more

America is in such dire straits at present that only someone with divine appointment could rise to recue the country. His rise would appear to be divinely ordained. Commentators are starting to attribute messianic qualities to Paul. His presence in the race is obviously not being welcomed by the mainstream media. Would this be because Paul would represent the greatest threat to the controllers of Presidents? If elected, he might not do what he's is told. We couldn't have that, could we?

Captain America vs Corporate America

When Captain America throws his mighty shield,
All those who chose to oppose his shield must yield..

NB: NO SPOILERS

It is bizarre that the new Captain America movie is hitting the silver screen at a time in America'a history when the country is on its knees. In 2 days time they reach the deadline for extending the debt ceiling. The country must choose between default on their loan repayments, massive cut backs on spending or raise the limit on the credit card and delay the inevitable. Either way, the future looks bleak. A default will have devastating repercussions for the world economy. Australia will not avoid the shock wave.

I grew up watching Captain America and the other Marvel super heroes on Saturday morning TV. So it was these 40 year old memories that formed the basis of my expectation of the new movie. I was not disappointed.

This movie is easily one of the best of its genre...and one of the most ironic. Set in a alternative WW2 history, Captain America is by nature a good guy who hates bullies and uses his powers to thump the evil Nazi Red Skull and spare the world from doom.


There are numerous references to the New World Order. Red Skull's aim is to evolve his race into super humans and rule the world through a scientific technocracy. He declares that he is leaving the rest of humanity behind. He loathes Captain America's fidelity to his country and his love of the flag. He says "There are no countries".

The sad reality is that Corporate America has adopted Red Skull's agenda...world domination through military technological superiority, weird animal/human hybrid gene splicing technology, destruction of national boundaries and trade barriers. And strangely enough, it was the commandeering of Nazi scientists at the end of the war through Operation Paperclip that has given the US the technological edge ever since.

As a movie, Captain America is captivating and inspiring. The character's superhero powers are cleverly developed without resorting to incredulous feats eg Hulk's flea jumping and Spiderman's stretching arms. The storyline nicely weaves in Tony Starck's (Ironman's) father as the genius behind the technology. The shield is cool. How they get from WW2 to modern day to make the upcoming Avengers movie possible, is brilliant. Not to be missed.

Carbon Tax - Sins of Emission

Prime Minister Gillard has finally laid her Carbon Tax cards on the table. This is despite the fact she promised us before the election we would not get a carbon tax. It was interesting to see a poll conducted on Channel Ten Sydney last night. The immediate reaction to the question “Will the carbon tax be good for Australia?” 81% said “No”.

Another thing I’ve noticed. Gillard has spoken a lot about the tax, but only now is she mentioning “carbon credits”. It’s one thing to have a tax. Even if the premise is bogus, at least the money is collected by government and is redirected back into the Australian economy. However, if the tax is used to purchase carbon credits on the international market or set up the economic infrastructure to make it possible, that’s just opening the door for our prosperity to be sucked out of our country.

We are being taxed for producing carbon, something which, to the average person, has no tangible substance. This “nothing” is somehow measured and quantified. This turns into a penalty notice or a sin. We absolve ourselves by purchasing an indulgence or a carbon credit to expunge our guilt. We show our indulgence to the climate papacy and they grant us forgiveness for our sins of emission. This was a cruel scam in the middle ages. It is no less so today.




exerpt from "Fall of the Republic" - carbon trading scam in a 6 min nutshell

The banks will love it. Look how they have wrecked the world economy with dodgy derivatives and toxic assets whilst feathering their own nests through the digital mayhem. Carbon trading is so nebulous it will be a playground for scammers. Where are the countries that are planting hectares of trees and sucking up all the carbon that they can afford to sell “carbon credits” anyway?




Europol uncovers European carbon trading scam in 2008

What's really tragic is the fact that this carbon fiasco gets all the airtime whilst other real crises get little or no coverage: peak oil, US dollar collapse, US debt default, global food crisis...and any of these can spark world war or turn our world upsidedown very quickly indeed. When the food shelves at Coles start to look empty you won't be worrying about the thermometer.

Happy 4th of July!

In Australia, we don't celebrate July 4th. It's just another day. But in the "land of the free" and "home of the brave"...it's time to celebrate a country that was founded on personal freedom bought with the blood and courage of rebels pitted against a tyrranical British empire.

Here are 6 examples of what freedom means in America today...








And where are the brave?