Tuesday, February 16, 2010

My Name is Khan


One of the many interests I have is watching Bollywood movies. Yesterday, I watched “My Name is Khan” starring Sharukh Khan. Anyone familiar with this genre knows that Sharukh is a mega star. He is also the same man who is currently in the news for being naked body scanned in London then autographing printouts for staff. See my earlier post. Looking at the timing of this event coinciding with the release of the movie, I now suspect that it was a clever publicity stunt. Nevertheless, it still highlights the concerns of allowing the government to use such devices on the people.

From the outset, let me say it's a great flick. It has most of the things you would get in a typical Bollywood movie. It's long by western standards at over 2 and a half hours long, but Bollywoods usually go up to 3 hours. It's an epic. It's an emotional rollercoaster. It's got singing and dancing (in small doses). It's got high drama. It's got Sharukh Khan.

The story is based on a man with Aspergers Syndrome (autistic spectrum disorder) who finds himself in the post 9/11 world being treated like a terrorist because he's brown and he's a muslim. In reality he's just a guy with a disability who only sees the world having two types of people, those who do good and those who do bad. Khan, as the hero, is on the good side, of course.

Whilst I sat and watched, I knew the audience was watching this story on one level, getting angry with the fundamentalist muslims who supposedly did 9/11 and thus polarizing the world against Islam and Rizvan Khan and his family. However, I reacted differently. I was angry from the beginning, because I knew that his disability could well have come from mercury poisoning in vaccines. Then I found myself angry by the paranoia shown by the airport security goons to Khan because of his colour, his autistic mannerisms and because his name is Khan. Why not search guys with names like Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld? They might actually find something.

I surprised myself when I saw scenes of 9/11 unfolding, the shock and horror on the faces of all who turned on the TV. I thought that as I have watched and studied so much about this day I would watch this scene like a dispassionate documentary. I didn't. It was deeply emotional. Anyway, you know how the story goes. The people of America are instantly polarized, white vs arabic/Indian, and former friends become enemies and the world lives in fabricated fear of Al Qaeda.

One question that is often asked, if 9/11 was an inside job, a false flag operation, how could the perpetrators organise to have so many innocent people killed and live with themselves afterwards? I now pose another question. How could anyone deliberately put a knife through the heart of an entire nation and kill its soul? Not only was this polarization an effect of 9/11, it was deliberately intended as a primary objective. The Bush administration needed a “catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbor” to create public support for a “war on terror” to have an excuse to invade and occupy Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the agenda for US global dominance.

I watched Khan make attempts to meet George W to tell him “My name is Khan and I'm not a terrorist”. Then I thought, he'd probably reply “Your name is can? Can of what? Can of beans?! Ha ha ha!” .

Then I see Khan attempting to meet Obama. Then in my script Obama would say “Yeah Mr Khan, I know you're not a terrorist, but I do know who is. Unfortunately, I have to protect them by never acknowledging the mounting evidence, even when presented by stars like Charlie Sheen. Despite the peer reviewed studies finding unexploded thermitic material in the dust samples of 9/11 and the 1000 engineers and architects demanding a new and open inquiry into 9/11, I have to maintain this facade of ignorance and let sleeping dogs lie”.
My Name is Khan continues the trend set by Bride & Prejudice and Slumdog Millionaire which repackaged Bollywood fare for the western palate. It's got sub-titles so don't forget your glasses. I recommend you don't go the large size drink from the candy bar. You'll be busting your bladder by the end because you won't want to duck out to the john incase you miss something.
Highly recommended.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

"Be more positive!"



Some people say to me, I should be more positive. “End your posts with something uplifting”.

Why?

Why should I do that? Why would you even suggest that? Are you so conditioned by the Hollywood movie formula that prescribes a guaranteed happy ending? The guy gets the girl, they walk off into the sunset and live happily ever after.

Perhaps you know too well you are living in a crooked world but you would rather go on living in self denial because that's easier to accommodate. “Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies” sang Fleetwood Mac.

Maybe you're in that group of believers that says “I'm a believer, God's in control, she'll be right mate”, then you go back to your Facespace page or the sportspage in the back of the Telegraph (don't distract me whilst I'm being distracted).

How about the “Jesus is returning soon, I'll just let him sort it out” rapture-ready worldview? What a cop-out.

On the other hand, could it be that your faith is so weak that you can't be left alone with a problem of evil that I present to you? Do you feel powerless to respond? God couldn't possibly want to involve you, yes you, in the establishment of his kingdom. He wouldn't equip you or give you the resources or skills to take the fight to the lord of this world? If you feel powerless in the face of evil then you've got some fundamental limitations in your Christianity and understanding of the Kingdom. It's like you've got the demo version of the game and you wonder why it your experience isn't the same as the paid-for/registered version.

Yes, as Christians and believers we know we are on the winning side of human history. Jesus will return one day to put the demons in the pit and God's will shall be done on earth as in heaven. Yes, there is a happy ending, but folks, we're not there yet. We are still in the final fight scene where Luke Skywalker is fighting to the death with Darth Vadar. There is a battle being waged between God vs Devil, good vs evil, truth vs lies, freedom vs slavery, life vs death. The thing is, we are not watching a video. Life on Earth is a David Attenborough series you can hire from Blockbuster, but the real Life on Earth is a live performance. You, my friend, are in the cast and you have some lines to deliver.

Again, just imagine if you took Jesus aside during one of his sermons... “JC, you really should be more positive, you can't talk about Hell and judgement like that, it's a conversation killer”. What if you were to admonish Daniel for depressing people with his prophecies of doom? I'm sure he would say something like “Hey buddy, I'm just the messenger.”

Like many of us “watchmen”, we simply stand at the parapets and call it as we see it. We are staring at the horizon though a looking glass, trying to focus on what we see heading our way. An early warning system, so to speak. If there's a threat, we warn. If there is an obvious line of action to be taken, we can recommend that you take that action. If there's a deception being peddled we try to shine the light of truth. However, we don't have all the answers and nor should we. Someone else out there may be better equipped to give the better solution or response.

At the end of the day, I'm just a $10 smoke detector that's smelling smoke and sounding the alarm. You can choose to lie in bed because you'd rather go on sleeping. You can fob yourself off by thinking it's just a false alarm. You could wait for Jesus to attend to it. You can even wait for the battery to go flat. Alternatively, you could do what your duty demands of you and get up and check for yourself whether or not your house is really on fire and you need to take action.


Just don't ask me to "be positive" if I can see your butt's on fire :o)

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Chicken or the Egg?

It’s the old conundrum, which came first, the chicken or the egg? Let’s apply this to terrorism (chicken) and full body scanners (egg). The official media line is – Problem: a black guy with a foreign sounding name and believedtobelinkedtoalqaeda tries to create an explosion in his pants with a view to bringing down a Northwest Airlines jet. Reaction: In response to this new terrorist threat we are told we need full body scanners at all airports to check every passenger for devices carried close to their bodies. Solution: roll out installation of full body scanners ASAP across the globe.
Now let’s start with the full body scanners (egg). We have an agenda to have full body scanners installed in all airports (we will get to motive later). We make sure we have a terrorist event (chicken) in which a full body scanner would have prevented such event. Scanners are the answer. Scanners get rolled out.
What we have here is problem, reaction , solution or more technically named the Hegelian Dialectic. It is nothing new. This technique is almost cliché in military, marketing and political circles. It's a cheap parlor trick, but a successful one.

So what evidence is there that this is anything more than another suicidal muslim looking for some western payback and a golden wings queue jump into paradise? From the outset, the official story has wondered and wavered. Kurt Haskell's eyewitness testimony concerning accomplices has been ignored.

The official story is also unbelievable. Again, like 9/11, the plot relies on a complete and comprehensive failure of the security system. Despite the fact that Abdullah's father personally contacted the authroities to warn that he suspected his son to be planning something, they failed to act. They also failed to revoke his visa application even though they had reason to do so.

Jasper Schuringa, the guy who put out the fire, says the suspect was "staring into nothing". This could indicate a religious fruitcake sensing his own demise, or it could also indicate a subject of mind control executing a pre-programmed operation. Look at the CIA's MK-Ultra programs from the 70s.

Next, the way in which the explosives were carried onto the plane, in his “reg grundies”(undies) is exactly the type of concealment that would only be detected by a full strip search. This was not a turban bomb or a shoe bomb or a belt bomb that could be found with current less invasive procedures.
So why on earth would authorities want full body scanners in airports? The reason is simple. There is an agenda across the globe to bring populations under greater and greater control. This includes how we use our money, where and how we travel, our health, our consumption, our desires and our reproduction to name just a few. We are being acclimatised to accept this ever increasing level of control and it's being done incrementally, death by a thousand cuts.

Let's just understand what they are asking us to give them. They are wanting a level of access to our bodies that we would normally reserve for the most intimate of human relationships, ie marriage or by medical necessity with our doctor. The details revealed by the scans leave little to the imagination.

There's a fundamental spiritual dimension to this also. When Adam and Eve transgressed against God in the garden, we are told that their eyes were opened and they became aware of their nakedness before God and felt shame, at which point they grabbed for the fig leaves. The naked body scanner reprises this scene, but the state now plays the role of God. It's the ultimate power display over another human to take away their clothing and enforce nakedness. It's the pinnacle of degradation. Remember the images of naked Jews in holocaust camps. Can you imagine anything worse?

To what extent do we tolerate this invasion? “But it's worth the loss of some of our liberties to ensure our security?” What sort of deal is that if the threat is bogus? Benjamin Franklin said “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither"

Can't you just see the guys at the gate taking more interest in your wife's scan than yours? How long before celebrity scans are leaked on the net and creates a whole new brand of porn? "I told you so" UPDATE: Sharukh Khan scan-dal. What next? Blood tests to check for swine flu? VeriChip has already patented an implantable chip that can send a signal to medical authorities if the host becomes swine flu positive.

We must resist these measures as they are proposed, before they have a chance to spawn. It's much harder to have these things removed once installed and accepted. What you see now is a trend towards totalitarianism. Taken to its logical extent, under a tyrannical regime, it results in loss of free speech, identification of dissenters, detention camps, youth brigades, disappearing of troublemakers etc. You get the drift. Why do you think the greatest protests over the Google Street View rollout came from Germany? The older and wiser folk recognize the architecture of tyranny when they see it.

This very day, our Federal government announced a $200 million program to implement security upgrades at Australian airports. This agenda includes naked body scanners. Will you accept this quietly? You should write to your local member and tell them that you do not support the use of scanners. Consider a display of civil disobedience by refusing loudly to comply at the gate. Don't regret in the years to come that we should have taken action when we had the chance.
$200 million to boost airport security

Monday, February 8, 2010

Secret Banker Meeting in Sydney

A secretive meeting of the top central bankers is meeting in Sydney at the moment. It is not being widely reported however.

Here's the news.com.au report.
Heraldsun report

LATEST UPDATE 09 02 2010

It is speculated that Ben Bernanke will attend, but is not confirmed. Why are they meeting? Who called the meeting? Does it have anything to do with the worsening debt crises in Spain, Portugal, Greece and Dubai? Could it be the sudden fall on world stock markets over the last few days? Why Sydney, we're hardly a convenient meeting point from a global point of view. Is China about to call in the debt collectors? And why the secrecy?

Many commentators have been saying that the global financial crisis will come in waves. Are the bankers preparing for GFC 2.0 ? Stay tuned...

Thursday, January 28, 2010

"Don't let a good crisis go to waste"

The elite have a saying "Don't let a good crisis go to waste". Those who seek rapid structural changes to countries and cultures have known for a long time that the best time to do these things is during a crisis. At such times people are preoccupied with just surviving, calling on their loved ones, finding food and shelter or defending their person or family. They're not listening to parliament on the radio or reading newspapers. Haiti is such a country right now following their devastating earthquake a couple of weeks ago.

Watch the vultures as they circle. At one level, orphan children are being taken from the streets and being trafficked to the west. Read this ninemsn article from this morning. Even more heinous, if it's true, a "Christian" organisation is being charged with offences. Also, bodies are being looted for organs (what's the bet that nearly dead is good enough). Hear it from the Haitian prime minister himself on CNN:





That's on the bottom feeder level. On the bigger picture, watch the US suddenly being incredibly interested in "helping" with the rescue effort and sending in large numbers of troops, naval ships and an aircraft carrier. Don't be surprised if this temporary humanitarian effort gradually becomes a permanent occupation force in Haiti. This has not gone unnoticed by Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua. This is not the first time this has happened either. In 1915 the US invaded and occupied Haiti during a period of civil unrest and didn't leave until 1934 (They are obviously not terribly effective at peace keeping roles if it took 19 years to get the country under control). It's more politically palatable taking control of another country on the sly than with a war like invasion.

Although Haiti is officially the poorest nation in the western hemispere with over 80% living in poverty, it offers the US a valuable strategic position in the Carribean, being right next door to Cuba. If they wanted to help so badly, why wait until now?

Watch who gets control of redevelopment funds and see how the money gets and doesn't get spent. Watch how the better pieces of real estate that once were neighborhoods for the poor suddenly become 5 star hotels.

And to top it off, watch "Christian" television media mogul Pat Robertson make the point that Haiti deserved this divine judgement from God because many years ago they made a pact with the devil. Did anyone give thought to the real reason Haiti was "judged" by an earthquake? Could it have anything to do with the fact that their poverty, in large part induced by the west, prevents the Haitians from being able to afford proper structural engineering and earthquake resistant construction? Please, pass me a bucket. I feel sick.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Eat drink & be merry, for tomorrow you diet


It's a new year, and with the new year comes the inevitable new years resolution. According to statistics, most resolutions relate to losing weight, eating better and stopping smoking. Let's consider losing weight.
There is no doubt that Australians are getting more and more obese each year. Just look at how many three seaters on the train can now only fit two. There are three basic choices of strategy:
i)shove less in your gob
ii)get off your broad acres and exercise more or
iii)cheat. How do you cheat? You adopt the “Have your cake and you eat it too” approach. You go for the artificial sweeteners, diet soft drinks, lo-cal and “lite”options. However, this could be a dodgy choice.

If you vowed to lose weight and started consuming products containing aspartame, you may already be suffering the following symptoms (as reported to the FDA in the table below):

headache, dizziness, change of mood, vomiting, abdominal cramps, change of vision, diarrhea, convulsions & seizures.....

The majority of complaints seem to be associated with diet drinks and sweeteners.



















The chemistry is simple. Aspartame is comprised of aspartic acid, phenylalanine & methyl ester. In the body it converts into formaldahide (which is laboratory embalming fluid) and methyl alcohol (which is wood alcohol, a poison).
The following video entitled “Sweet Misery” is a comprehensive study of aspartame as an artificial sweetener and the evidence for adverse side effects. It also investigates the chequered history of this product and how it negotiated the FDA (Food & Drug Administration) in the US and made its way onto your dining table.

Aspartame is now everywhere. It's identified as “sweetener E951” on the ingredients info on food packaging in Australia and Europe. It goes under the brands "NutraSweet" and "Equal" to name two. It is increasingly appearing in chewing gums and breath mints that have long been traditional sugar based. In Australia, Wrigleys PK chewing gum includes it in the regular flavour (yellow pack) but not in the spearmint variety (blue pack). The warning "Phenylketonurics: contains Phenylalanine" appears on the yellow pack but not the blue pack. That means, if you're alergic to phenylalanine, consider yourself warned". So you have to be vigilant.

Look through the ingredients of lollies and sweets. We are allowing our children to be exposed to this stuff and it's replacing sugar in more and more products like ice cream, ice blocks and iced tea drinks. I bought some Tang recently for hiking and that is now artificially sweetened.

Why be so suspicious about aspartame? You need to watch the video to get the science and medical evidence, but for me, I only have to know that M o n s a n t o used to own G D Searle who invented the stuff and got it approved with the help of Sith Lord Donald Rumsfeld. Anyone who knows anything about M o n s a n t o and their agendas for genetically modified foods and global control of the food supply by means of patents would be concerned if they had been involved in a global reach product like aspartame.

If this stuff is as bad as it appears, why are we serving it up at church for morning tea? Why aren't we warning our friends and family about it? Probably for the same reason we don't tell them about the Gospel. Only you can answer that.

But I have heard it's the most tested food in history and that it's safe. Who did the tests? Who interpreted the data? Who funded the tests? Who had vested interests in government to get it passed?

So why is this product really in circulation? We need to look at the greater agenda for chemical control of large numbers of people through food, water fluoridation, vaccines and prescription drugs. A weaker, dumber and more docile population is far easier to control, keep sedate and profit from.

And in any case, I personally find diet version drinks tastes like crap compared to the normal sugar laden stuff, so why drink it? If you consume regular soft drinks in moderation and with self control, there is no need for the “diet” substitute.
You can have your cake and eat it too, just don't be a pig with your portion.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Aussies tell the ETS to POQ!

Could it be that Aussies aren't as asleep as we thought. Today, we got the great news that the Emissions Trading Scheme got voted down in the Senate. This means that Mr Rudd will not be in a position to sign the Copenhagen Treaty next week. This is a big blow to the global warming scam and the new world order taxation system. Who would have thought that on this issue the pollies would actually use their moral consciences and their individual thought processes to make an independent decision for the good of the country. Mind you, they had to throw the Liberal opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull overboard first to get the eventual consensus. This would demonstrate to me that although there is a false left/right paradigm operating most of the time to serve the general interests of the elites, this time, it didn't work.

Come on world, there are some vestiges of democracy still alive out there. Make your voice heard now. Call on your representative to send a message that the people are awakening to the ETS scam and we don't want it. There is only a weeks time left till Copenhagen!

We don't want our energy bills to skyrocket at the behest of some carbon credit baron schiester. We don't want to see aussie dollars syphoned off to the third world, not because we are selfish but we don't believe that elites selling carbon indulgences can be trusted any more than the Papal scammers of the middle ages. We want to see a fair equalising of rich & poor nations, but Jesus had a simpler solution to that, demonstrate love by giving to the poor. We don't want to see our democracies destroyed and wake up in a neo communist totalitarian nightmare.

If you haven't heard of Lord Monckton, well he's at the pointy end of the pin that's popping the climate warming bubble. He even got a proper airing on mainstream radio in Australia. Alan Jones interviewed Monckton recently (If you usually can't stand Alan Jones, he's not obnoxious in this interview).


Listen to the full address he made in Minnesota recently. If you like science, graphs and equations, this is for you. Even if you aren't that nerdy, his presentation is entertaining, passionate and compelling.

From his comments he's also a Christian, so praise God for raising up this man with these unique skills at this time in history to give the climate change demon a good thump on the head. Here is a great example of the Kingdom making a frontal assault on the mountain of government.

Unfortunately, many Australians are blissfully unaware of ETS or Copenhagen. Consequently, few will have any appreciation for what it means that the ETS Bill failed in the Senate, that at least for a moment, we have stepped back from the precipice and we now have time to think this through. Meanwhile, the US and other nations are still heading to Copenhagen. Unless their peoples demand their governments not to sign, the free world still faces a dire threat to their democracies.

Don't get me wrong. Wasting energy is wrong and we are polluting this magnificant planet. If we really must create disincentives for energy consumption, why not have our own government collect the tax and then channel that back into alternative energy research in Australia, or save the money for 10 years whilst we work out what's really going on with the climate. Give us our money back when we finally agree that global warming is rubbish. That way, we at least don't lose our money to the greatest of all Nigerian scams.